Training for Speed Matters – Part 3

If you missed the previous posts, you can find part 1 here and part 2 here

In attempting any activity the body tries to do it as efficiently as possible. When we pick up a pencil off the table, our fingers know how tightly to hold it, our arm and shoulder knows how much effort is required to lift it. If we drop that pencil and it rolls under the sofa, the body knows it needs to use a different level of effort to move the heavy sofa out of the way. If we go to the gym and try to pick up a 20kg weight it adjusts again. Much of this is learned through prior experience, our eyes know the size and shape of an object and make a best estimate of what it needs to do. We can get caught out trying to lift a small box or can that turns out to be filled with dense material but we quickly adjust to be able to complete the task.

It’s the same with exercise. Walking doesn’t take as much effort as jogging which itself is easier than running. When you sprint it’s an all-out effort and yet, if you try to sprint up a hill the body tries to work even harder.


Although we think of running as needing strong legs – it’s more than that. We also need strong hips and glutes; it’s about the core muscles and to a lesser extent the upper body shoulders and arms. Again, depending on how fast you’re trying to run, the more muscle your body recruits to get the job done.

At a slow walk your arms just swing back and forth; in an all-out sprint you will drive your arms backwards and forwards as well as use them for balance and stability. You only need to look at the difference between sprinters and marathon runners to see how different their physiques are.


This is the primary reason why you should be working on your speed – it recruits more muscle. If your top-end pace can’t get you below six minutes per mile –  you are never going to run any distance quicker than this. However if your top-end speed is four minute mile, you can do all the things you could when your top-end speed was six minute mile and everything in between. What’s not to like?!

For many of those runners who are stuck jogging around at ten minute miles. Imagine what training to be able to run at six minute mile pace … or quicker gives them. Suddenly where eight minute miles felt difficult, it begins to feel easier because it’s no longer top of the range.

Yet remember what I said about the body being efficient?  If you never train at high paces to get faster then gradually your body forgets the speed ability it has. This is often why older distance runners are slow – they stopped training their speed and focused on extended efforts. Inevitably there is some loss of speed due to ageing, but nowhere near as much as many runners believe.


It’s not just the skeletal muscles which benefit from training speed, it also works the heart and lungs and usually very hard if you put in a big effort and don’t give yourself easy recoveries. While it is unpleasant to be gasping for air – barely able to jog between efforts – in time it prompts your heart and lungs to adapt.

Your heart grows larger to pump more oxygenated blood to the muscles and potentially your lung capacity increases. The lungs become stronger and therefore more forceful when expelling carbon dioxide and breathing in air.

This training is going to make your running feel easier. Stronger legs, lower heart-rate, easier breathing.

If you decide to start training for speed, ease into it and, of course, if you have any health concerns – check with a health professional before pulling out all the stops and giving speed training a try.

If you’re unsure of how to start, I can help you with my 3-month speed training programme. Just go to the Contact page and message me to get more details.

Training for Speed Matters – Part 2

In the first part I discussed how many runners may be underperforming because they haven’t developed their speed. We saw how quickly Paula Radcliffe was running even when she was in the marathon.

Like Paula, almost all elite runners start out as track athletes usually in events lasting a mile or less. If they discover they don’t have the talent for that then they do longer track events – Eliud Kipchoge, the world’s premier marathoner, began by winning World Championship gold in the 5,000m at age 18. His winning time of 12:52.79 is a pace of 4:07/mile. He ran his best mile a year later in 3:50.


Let’s go back to 2012 when Mo Farah was in the early stages of his Olympic / World Championship dominance. He took part in the BBC’s Superstars TV programme and clocked 12.98s over 100m; followed in by the Brownlee brothers – champion triathletes with Jonny clocking 14.33s and Alistair 14.70s.   Obviously these times are nothing compared to elite sprinters but these are athletes who are better suited to distance events. I doubt they spent too much of their valuable training time on preparing for a TV contest’s 100metres but how would you compare?

Mo’s training is on record with him being able to run 100m off a 2-step start in 11sec, 200m in 25s and 400m in 51s.  When he won the 5000m Olympic title in Rio in 2016, his final lap was 52.7s having already run 4,600m.


I detailed in the Ageing runner series the world records for Masters runners at a variety of distances.  Here I will reproduce the latest records over 200m – ageing is often given as an excuse why runners aren’t fast. I contend it’s more often the case that they’ve failed to maximise their speed before attempting to become distance runners.

Of course these are the world records for Masters athletes who are committed to the sport. You or I will probably never be able to achieve the numbers for our age groups. Yet I feel it’s also worth considering that if you’re a man who can barely run 200m in under 35s, there is at least one 80-year-old woman who could beat you in a race. I don’t say that to disparage Carol Lafayette-Boyd who achieved it last year but more as an encouragement to anyone, male or female of younger years, to reconsider that they might be underutilising their talent.

It’s notable looking at these tables that the best men are still easily running under 30secs for 200m (4min/mile) into their seventies while the women are capable of it into their sixties. Of course these records are set by dedicated sprinters but until you try, you won’t know what you’re truly capable of.

Training for Speed Matters – Part 1

I like to ask runners I’m coaching to run 200m to give me an idea of their speed. I say to them “You don’t need to get the starting blocks out. You don’t need to go 100% all-out and risk injury. Just do a good warm-up, have a little break and then go run hard for 200m and see what your time is.”

The most recent lady who did this trial recorded a time of 45secs. This is not a terrible time by any means but what it does show is that at best, she will run 400m in 1min30, 800m in 3mins and a mile in six. Her parkrun time will be just under 19mins, a 10K in 38mins, half marathon 1hr20 and marathon 2hr40. Those latter numbers sound pretty damn amazing to anyone who isn’t already a decent runner.

But, and there is a huge but, when you run 200metres flat out – you’re going flat out. Your arms and legs are pumping like crazy. After twenty seconds you begin to hyperventilate and then it all starts to hurt and you’d prefer to stop. When you finished you’re gasping for breath. You’ll probably be bent over double for the next couple of minutes trying to get your breath back.  And that’s the problem – this is your absolute best and it’s only over 200m. It’s not going to transfer as you run longer distances.

It’s more realistic that if you run 45secs for 200m you’re probably looking at 25mins for parkrun, 52mins for 10K, 1hr55 for half marathon and 4hrs for the marathon. Again, these may be times you find impressive.

If we look at world-class runners, even Paula Radcliffe – the former world record holder for the women’s marathon – can break 30s for 200m. And she is a runner who is best suited to long distances. To give you perspective on Paula’s speed, here is a look at her Personal Bests:

Even when she runs a marathon, she is covering 200m quicker than all but a few recreational runners and it’s relatively effortless for her at that pace until perhaps the final miles when her fuel stores are depleted and her muscles aching.

Paula started out as a track runner. It was only as she approached thirty years old that she moved up in distance from races like the 5,000 and 10,000m to half and full marathons. While this is often true of recreational runners who begin with Couch25K and then try longer distances, the notable difference is that Paula had been training for the better part of twenty years before she moved up to the longest distances.

I wrote briefly about how her children have taken up running at the ages of 8 and 12 and could already run a kilometre in under 4mins. Her approach hasn’t been to have the kids running mile after mile in training but to run as fast as they can over shorter distances.

The consequence of being fast over a short distance is it allows you to be quick over longer ones. If you’re slow over short distances then all you can ever be is slow over long distances – that’s basic mathematics.

Build speed then build the endurance to cover the race distance you’re aiming for.

Paula’s kids

In my article about marathon speed, I wrote about how the best marathoners of the Sixties could all run 400 metres in under a minute. They started out at clubs where they developed their speed and only later worked on endurance. This idea has been something rolling around in my mind for a while now and I wanted to provide another example

Back in the November 2019 issue, Runner’s World ran an interview with Paula Radcliffe on getting more kids into running. One question and answer stood out to me:

RW: With parents like you and your husband Gary [Lough, coach to Sir Mo Farah] your children must be pretty active?

PR: Absolutely. Both of them [Isla, 12 and Raphael, 8] will sometimes do kilometre events in Monaco where we live. Isla recently ran 3:25 and Raph can do 3:43. We also recently dropped Raph into a one-mile race with a bunch of men and he actually finished third in a time of 6:26! He absolutely loved it. I’m not sure that the men did though …

Imagine that! An 8-year-old boy running 3:43 for a kilometre and a 12-year-old girl running 3:25. Now go out and see how quick you are. When I ran my 800m time trial at start of December 2020 I clocked 2:58 which is the same pace as Raphael but I have no doubt I’d have lagged behind him had I run another 200m. That quickness over the kilometre enables him to run a fast mile – it’s not like he’d stop at 1,001 metres and have to walk the rest. I’m guessing he’d have been hitting 22-23 minutes for a parkrun if they dropped him into one.

Now I could make excuses about small children having a good weight-to-power ratio, lower centres of gravity and no idea about pacing. But whatever the reason, these kids are QUICK and I’m doubtful it’s down to the genetics of their parents. It will be the excuse those men beaten over the mile give “He’s Paula Radcliffe’s son so he’s born to be good”. But I suspect the truth is more down to how Paula and Gary are coaching their children to run quickly first before they step up the distance.

I suspect if you could find a snapshot of Raphael against all those other mile racers, he would have been up the front from beginning to end. He would be one of the fastest over quarter mile, half mile and so on. The speed he carried through the distance with him gradually slowing as he went into the uncharted territory of the mile.

I genuinely believe 90% of people can run significantly faster if they train for it. I got sucked into working exclusively on endurance for the past four years and while my times remained decent I was struggling to hit the heights I’d once reached so easily. I used to have oodles of speed available because I pushed hard on every run and gasped my way up every hill; but I always felt something was missing when I raced. As I began to understand endurance it turned me into a more efficient runner who recorded faster race times. The only trouble was I lost touch with my speed. You have to keep going back to speed to maintain it. If you’re constantly racing and training at 6-10 min/mile, you lose the ability to finish at sub-4 paces. People think all the slow training kills their speed, it doesn’t. It only goes when they stop working on it.

Now ask yourself, if you raced Raphael or Isla, who would win? If the answer isn’t to your liking then it’s time to do something about it!

Eleven Bay Run Half Marathons – a retrospective

This year was apparently the 39th running of the Bournemouth Bay runs. I did my first in 1996 but it was almost a decade before I got back to it. My sporting time back then was dominated by playing and coaching volleyball; as well as going to circuit training and just about any other sport that I could find to fill my time with.

In 1996, like the majority of runners in yesterday’s race, I did a couple of months’ worth of basic training registering 10-20 miles per week at most in my preparation. I’d run my first half marathon at Portsmouth a month before and, in the lead-up to that, my only training aim was to do the distance in training albeit at a slow pace. I recall running on the February 29 (leap year) from Bournemouth pier to Boscombe pier and back (I reckoned it was 3-miles – not bad given it’s actually 2.85!). Then from Bournemouth pier to Shore Road and back (6-miles estimate, actually 5.6) and then another run to and from Boscombe pier to take it out to twelve miles which with a bit of distance to and from the car parked up on the East Cliff gave me confidence I would manage the distance. Then I went to Poole Sports Centre and played a volleyball match. That’s how I rolled in those days, cram in as much sport and activity as possible. No thought or understanding for recovery or the impact of doing too much.

I didn’t worry about how fast I was running, it was all about completing it. It was a time when my legs were big and strong from all the volleyball jumping and on race day I felt I couldn’t run any faster. I now I understand I simply didn’t have the aerobic training required for a fast half marathon and that reflects in my average heart-rate being in the 170s during the 1996 race. I distinctly recall running along, feeling comfortable, chatting to the chap near me and saying my heart-rate was at 177bpm and him replying “That sounds a bit high”. I’d tend to agree with him now!!

YearTime (HH:MM:SS)RankPace (min/mile)Avg. HR
19961:50:3510th8:26170-175
20051:54:46Slowest8:45
20061:49:559th8:23
     
20101:38:304th7:31
20121:31:08Fastest6:57160
20131:39:436th7:36159
20161:40:178th7:39157
20171:35:373rd7:18157
20181:39:547th7:37158
20191:39:345th7:35155
20221:33:432nd7:08153

By the time I ran in 2010, I’d given up the volleyball and while my legs were still big I was running more regularly yet rarely more than twenty miles per week. I’d run a 1hr16 ten mile race three weeks before and most of my lunchtime 6K training runs were all-out efforts with a long run on the weekend. That was a game changing race as I set off fast from the beginning where previously I’d always lagged back then enjoyed working my way through the field. When I ran 1hr38 I was somewhat elated to take over ten minutes off my previous best.

It was late 2011 when I started taking running seriously and building my aerobic base. So at this stage, I still had the strong legs and while I didn’t fully understand how to train, I was beginning to learn. It led to my fastest half marathon ever and two-plus minutes ahead of this year.

What strikes me about most of the intervening half marathons is they’re all grouped around the 1hr39 mark. This could be a coincidence but I don’t think so. I’m sure it’s some kind of indicator of my natural level when I’ve done some training but not too much. The halfs in 2013, 2016, 2018 were all coming back from injury during the month or so before.

The one recent outlier is 2017 (my 3rd fastest) when I had deliberately done lots of jogging in the two months preceding it (400+ miles) and less than fifteen total miles at race pace. The result was good but I paid for it in the following days with soreness lasting until Thursday. Even so when I’d recovered three weeks later, I found myself running a 2½-mile effort run at 6:30/mile – significantly faster than the 7min/mile pace I had been running it in the weeks before the half.

Comparing 2012 vs 2022

In 2012, the average heart-rate was 160bpm and I spent fifty-nine minutes above it, maxing at 170bpm! Compare that to yesterday where my max only touched 160 a couple of times. It’s clear my aerobic base is improving yet that isn’t the only part of the story even for a half marathon. I was able to run a faster half marathon in 2012 with a worse base but the faster speed wasn’t there. I’m fairly sure my legs didn’t have enough taper from all the training but had I done so, I might have been in record-breaking form.

The flipside to the heart-rates is when I look back at my early Bay runs, I didn’t have enough of an aerobic base to run these sort of times. The high heart-rates in the 170s demonstrate that. There’s some kind of balance to be found.

Mileage isn’t everything

Another point of interest when comparing my 2012 and 2022 runs are my training logs for the preceding weeks. In 2012, my average weekly mileage was 33½ – 39, 26, 30, 36, 39 and 32; which is about 50% less than what I did this year when I was averaging 50.

I seem to run much better off lower mileage – perhaps in part because it leaves less to recover from. In those days I would take at least one day – Friday – off each week; this year I’d been running every day for over two years until I rested the two days before the half marathon.

I’m increasingly conscious that while some bang on about doing high mileage – it is not the be-all and end-all of running success. And certainly not critical if all you’re interested in is a parkrun or 10K race. Get quick over the shorter distances and the mileage will naturally increase.


I‘m hopeful once my legs recover I will be in a position to surpass everything I did in 2012. Back then I spent the year running sub-20 every Saturday at parkrun and training hard to break nineteen minutes but it never quite happened until the end of the year – after I’d done a block of endurance training. I always knew endurance training was important but could never quite understand how, ten years on I do.

Short sprint – Ordinary speed

In True Speed I wrote about the high speeds at which elite runners run their races; speeds which ordinary runners can barely hit in a sprint. Today we’re going to look at what ordinary speed looks like. Outside of an elite race, most runners are running somewhere between six and ten miles per hour. Even the guys and gals up the front winning the prizes in your local race aren’t running much faster than this. Sometimes it’s even true for elites too, when Gwen Jorgensen was winning her Olympic Gold for triathlon, her 10K was ‘only’ around 11mph, so there’s no shame in not being super fast; only an attempt to better understand what’s going on.

Let’s begin with parkrun. In the table below I’ve listed the times between sixteen and thirty minutes as all but a few parkruns are run in that range. Of course quicker times are available, Andrew Baddeley holds the world record time of 13:48 while Lauren Reid ran 15:45 earlier this year to set a new women’s record.

Parkrun timeMphKm/hMin/mileMin/km
1611.718.85min093min12
1711.017.65min283min24
1810.416.75min473min36
199.815.86min073min48
209.315.06min264min00
218.914.36min454min12
228.513.67min044min24
238.113.07min234min36
247.812.57min434min48
257.512.08min025min00
267.211.58min225min12
276.911.18min415min24
286.710.79min005min36
296.410.39min195min48
306.210.09min396min00

If you want to train to get faster, it’s a useful table for understanding what speeds and paces you’ll need to be running. Once any initial burst of training sees your times levelling off, you have to start training smart.

You do intervals at paces a little quicker than you’re currently running while keeping the majority of your running at paces for a parkrun that’s 2½ – 3½ minutes slower. That’s 2½ minutes for the runners near sixteen and 3½ for those at thirty  If you’re currently running 22-mins at 7min/mile, you’ll want to be training no faster than the pace of a 25-min parkrun (three minutes slower). Even more of your training should be at the pace of a parkrun that’s five minutes slower than you’re currently running.


But we’re not only parkrunners so let’s have a look at what speeds we’re running for different race distances. The vast majority of runners are barely hitting 8mph in any of their races; most are even slower. The top end are the elite values to give you an idea of where there’s capacity for improvement.

4 mph5678910111213
parkrun46min3937min1931min0626min4023min2020min4518min4016min5815min3314min21
10K1hr331hr151hr0253min1946min3941min2937min1933min5631min0628min42
1/2M3hr162hr272hr111hr521hr381hr271hr191hr121hr061hr00
Marathon6hr335hr154hr223hr453hr162hr552hr372hr232hr112hr01

Of course reaching the highest speeds takes lots of dedicated training but certainly isn’t impossible if you understand what you need to do. Most people can run at 10mph (or 6min/mile pace) if only for twenty or thirty metres. If you can do this, then it’s probable with good endurance training you can improve to run times you wouldn’t have considered possible.

Most runners I see are good at unlocking their natural talent but then spend their training time reinforcing it without notable improvement. They seem happy if they’re knocking a minute or two off their marathon after months of hard training. My 10K went from 48 minutes to sub-40 when I got my training right. My early half marathons all came in at 1hr50 but when I took up running seriously I got them closer to 1hr30. I still believe there is significant room for improvement in all my races when I’m done with 800m training. I won’t settle for less, will you?

Short sprint – True Speed

In Being Fast, I talked about the vagaries of language and mentioned some of the speeds elite runners run at. I thought it would be useful to look at the speed and paces for all the major world records. It only becomes clear when you see these, how fast the best in world are running, and begin to realise how much the rest of us neglect speed.

MenPerf. Mi/hKm/h Per milePer km Athlete
Top speed  27.844.7 2min101min21 Usain Bolt
100 m9.58 23.437.6 2min341min36 Usain Bolt
200 m19.19 23.337.5 2min341min36 Usain Bolt
400 m43.03 20.833.5 2min531min48 Wayde van Niekerk
800 m1:40.9 17.728.5 3min222min06 David Rudisha
1000 m2:12.0 17.027.3 3min322min12 Noah Ngeny
1500 m3:26.0 16.326.2 3min412min17 Hicham El Guerrouj
Mile3:43.1 16.126.0 3min432min19 Hicham El Guerrouj
3000 m7:20.7 15.224.5 3min562min27 Daniel Komen
5000 m12:35 14.823.8 4min032min31 Joshua Cheptegei
10,000 m26:11 14.222.9 4min132min37 Joshua Cheptegei
Half marathon57:32 13.722.0 4min232min44 Kibiwott Kandie
Marathon1:59:40 13.121.2 4min342min50 Eliud Kipchoge
100 km6:09:14 10.116.2 5min573min42 Nao Kazami
Women   
100 m10.49 21.334.3 2min491min45 Florence Griffith Joyner
200 m21.34 21.033.7 2min521min47 Florence Griffith Joyner
400 m47.6 18.830.3 3min121min59 Marita Koch
800 m1:53.3 15.825.4 3min482min22 Jarmila Kratochvílová
1000 m2:29.0 15.024.2 4min002min29 Svetlana Masterkova
1500 m3:50.1 14.623.5 4min072min34 Genzebe Dibaba
Mile4:12.3 14.323.0 4min122min37 Sifan Hassan
3000 m8:06.1 13.822.2 4min212min42 Wang Junxia
5000 m14:06 13.221.3 4min332min49 Letesenbet Gidey
10,000 m29:17 12.720.5 4min432min56 Almaz Ayana
Half marathon1:04:31 12.219.6 4min553min03 Ababel Yeshaneh
Marathon2:14:04 11.718.9 5min073min11 Brigid Kosgei
100 km6:33:11 9.515.3 6min203min56 Tomoe Abe
World record times for the major distance events (correct at 26-Apr-2021)

When you compare the men’s and women’s records side by side you see there’s consistently a difference of around 11-12% between them. This is believed to be down to the physical differences between the sexes, that men’s higher levels of testosterone allow them to have bigger muscles which in turn propel them quicker.

EventMen WRWomen WR% diff.
100 m9.5810.499.5
200 m19.1921.3411.2
400 m43.0347.610.6
800 m01:40.901:53.312.3
1000 m02:12.002:29.012.9
1500 m03:26.003:50.111.7
Mile03:43.104:12.313.1
3000 m07:20.708:06.110.3
5000 m12:35.414:06.612.1
10,000 m26:11.029:17.411.9
Half marathon57:32.01:04:3112.1
Marathon1:59:402:14:0412.0
100 km06:09:1406:33:116.5

The two most notable anomalies are at the ends of the spectrum. Florence Griffith-Joyner’s 100m world record was set in 1988 but the video evidence shows there was a strong wind that day, yet the wind gauge recorded 0.0m/s assistance. It’s thought to be a faulty gauge. If, however, you add 11% to Usain Bolt’s 9.58s then then the women’s time should be 9.63s which is close to the 10.61s FloJo recorded the next day and the 10.62s she recorded in winning Olympic gold two months later.

At the other end there is the 100km where the difference is 6.5%. At this distance, the best runners are genetically determined towards endurance and lack the fast-twitch muscle necessary for top speed. Their slow-twitch muscle is naturally resilient and the testosterone difference between the sexes is much less of a factor.

Some of the outliers between men’s and women’s records are down to lack of drug-testing or detectability when the records were set, how often the distances are raced and over the past year we’ve seen distance records being broken with championships cancelled due to Covid and runners taking advantage of energy-efficient shoes.


I’ll return to the point I was trying to make in the Being Fast article, most runners don’t have true speed and that’s because they often fail to train for it. It’s not the only requirement for being a distance runner but it is an important part of it.

My coached sessions are focused on getting you quicker while building the endurance to support it. Everybody’s welcome. In the meantime, enjoy the following video of runners trying to keep pace with Eliud Kipchoge’s sub-2hr marathon pace.